All November 2024 Endorsements

Thank you to everyone that participated in our November 2024 endorsements! We had a lot of great candidates come to speak with us during our meetings earlier this year and how they plan to fight for progressive values in San Francisco.  Here is a summary of our endorsements, all on one page!

Here are the propositions, which are here on our website for the first time!

 Local Measures

  • A: Yes ✅ SFUSD facilities bond
  • B: Yes ✅ Community health & safety bond
  • C: Yes ✅ Create an Inspector General
  • D: HELL NO! ❌❌❌ Eliminates dozens of commissions and removes public oversight
  • E: HELL YES! ✅✅✅ Smart commission reform
  • F: No ❌ Lets police double their salaries
  • G: Yes ✅ Establish a Fund for Rental Subsidies for Extremely Low Income Residents
  • I: Yes ✅Allows Nurses and 911 operators to get retirement benefits they were denied
  • J: No ❌ puts more SFUSD money in the hands of the mayor
  • K: Yes ✅ permanently close the Upper Great Highway to private vehicles
  • L: HELL YES! ✅✅✅ Tax Uber and Waymo to fund MUNI (but it has to get more votes than Prop M!)
  • M: No ❌ weakens overpaid CEO tax and could prevent measure L from taking effect
  • O: Yes ✅ make SF a reproductive rights sanctuary city

Statewide Ballot Propositions

  • Prop 2: Yes ✅ publich school and community college facilities bond
  • Prop 3: HELL YES! ✅✅✅ enshrines same sex marriage into the state’s constitution
  • Prop 4: Yes ✅ drought preparedness bond
  • Prop 5: Yes ✅ lower voter approval for affordable housing and local infrastructure from 2/3 to 55%
  • Prop 6: HELL YES! ✅✅✅ prohibit slavery in CA prisons
  • Prop 32: Yes ✅ raises state minimum wage to $18/hour with cost of living adjustment subsequent
  • Prop 33: HELL YES! ✅ repeals Costa-Hawkins and allows cities to expand rent control
  • Prop 34: No ❌ CA Apartment Association’s retailiatory measure againast AIDS Healthcare Foundation for funding Prop 33
  • Prop 35: Yes ✅ creates permanent funding source for Medi-Cal
  • Prop 36: No ❌ criminalizes homelessness and reinstates felony sentences for some theft and drug charges

And here are the candidate endorsements from earlier this year:

Mayor

  • Aaron Peskin

San Francisco Board of Supervisors

  • D1: Connie Chan
  • D3: Sharon Lai
  • D5: Dean Preston
  • D7: Myrna Melgar*
  • D9: 1. Jackie Fielder; 2. Stephen Torres
  • D11: 1. Chyanne Chen; 2. EJ Jones

Board of Education

  • Matt Alexander

City College Board of Trustees

  • Alan Wong

District Attorney

  • Ryan Khojasteh

BART, D9

  • Edward Wright

Assembly District 19

  • David Lee

About our endorsements

* Recommend :  If you want to vote for this office, this is who we recommend.

No Endorsement :  We neither recommend or endorse a position.

No Position:  No consensus was reached among membership.

November 2024 Election Endorsements – Second Round

The San Francisco Berniecrats are pleased to reveal the second round of our democratically decided November 2024 Election Endorsements. We will hold another round of endorsements for propositions and measures  soon.

District 3 Supervisor, first choice, Sharon Lai

District 7 Supervisor, first choice, Myrna Melgar

District 9 Supervisor, first choice, Jackie Fielder

District 9 Supervisor, second choice, Stephen Torres

District 11 Supervisor, first choice, Chynanne Chen

District 11 Supervisor, second choice, Ernest Jones

District Attorney, Ryan Khojasteh

November 2024 Election Endorsements – First Round

The San Francisco Berniecrats are pleased to reveal the first round of our democratically decided November 2024 Election Endorsements. We will hold another round of endorsements for propositions, measures, and other candidates soon.

District 1 Supervisor, Connie Chan (unanimous)
District 5 Supervisor, Dean Preston (unanimous)
District 9 Supervisor, Jackie Fielder (unanimous)
Mayor, Aaron Peskin (unanimous)

Candidate Questionnaires – November 2024 Election

The San Francisco Berniecrats’ Endorsement Committee has received the following questionnaires from candidates under consideration for endorsement for the November 2024 Election:  

Mayor

Aaron Peskin Responses (pdf)

District 1 Supervisor

Connie Chan Responses (pdf)

Jen Nossokoff Responses (pdf)

District 3 Supervisor

Moe Jamil Responses (pdf)

Sharon Lai Responses (pdf)

Danny Sauter Responses (pdf)

Eduard Navarro Responses (pdf)

District 5 Supervisor

Amber Looijen Responses (pdf)

Dean Preston Responses (pdf)

District 7 Supervisor

Stephen Martin-Pinto Responses (pdf)

Myrna Melgar Responses (pdf)

District 9 Supervisor

Julian Bermudez Responses (pdf)

Jackie Fielder Responses (pdf)

Stephen Torres Responses (pdf)

District 11 Supervisor

Chyanne Chen Responses (pdf)

Ernest Jones Responses (pdf)

District Attorney

Ryan Khojasteh Responses (pdf)

 

The San Francisco Berniecrats join JVP Bay Area in condemning any attempts to censure, condemn, or cancel John Avalos for his tweet

“Never again means never again for anyone. Never again also means ppl of conscience have a responsibility to prevent the past fear & indifference to Jewish suffering from ever happening again to anyone anywhere. Ppl have the right to call out elected leaders’ complicity w/genocide”

The First Amendment is intended to protect the people’s right to speak out against the government. Government officials (e.g., State Senators, members of the Board of Supervisors) are obligated to listen to their constituents, not to lash out against the free exercise of speech.

Avalos’s social media post supported criticism of an elected state senator who refuses to call for a ceasefire in a war the International Court of Justice and a federal court in Oakland called “plausibly” genocidal. Like countless jurists, academics, human rights groups, and other experts around the world—including some of Israel’s leading Holocaust scholars—Avalos believes Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. So do we. And like Avalos, we condemn any elected official who is complicit.

During the McCarthy era of the Frightened Fifties, people were intimidated by the government for the exercise of their rights of association and freedom of speech. Many lost their jobs, employment and careers—even their families.

Now we are confronting books bans, library closures, study restrictions, job loss, even violence, all designed to silence opposition to genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Condemning John Avalos for his public, personal expression is the rearing of the McCarthyist Snake.

The San Francisco Berniecrats reject a return to those times. Please join us. Speak out. Call for a ceasefire NOW and an end to Israeli genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza and throughout illegally occupied Palestine. Oppose the New McCarthyism.

March 2024 Primary Endorsements

San Francisco Berniecrats’ Voter Guide with March 2024 Primary Endorsements

The San Francisco Berniecrats are pleased to reveal the below voter guide with our democratically decided March 2024 Primary Endorsements.

UPDATE: We apologize to Queena Chen (陳慧君) and Gloria Berry (歌莉·婭貝理) for providing the incorrect Chinese versions of their name. We erred in using the Department of Election’s provided materials without close scrutiny. We are proud to offer the only trilingual voter guide in San Francisco, and as such we must hold ourselves to a higher standard.

Jump down to:
Candidates
Propositions and Measures

San Francisco Primary Election – Tuesday, March 5, 2024

Scroll down for more info and explanations!!

San Francisco March 2024 Voter Guide
San Francisco March 2024 Voter Guide
San Francisco March 2024 Voter Guide
More details and explanations about our positions:

Candidates / 候選人 / Candidatos:

The San Francisco Berniecrats only endorse candidates who align with the club values. We may recommend candidates who we cannot fully endorse. In all other races, we make no endorsement or recommendation.
三藩市桑徳斯民主協會只背書支持與我們一致價值觀的候選人。我們可能會推薦我們不能完全背書的候選人。在所有其他比賽中,我們不做任何背書或推薦。
Los Berniecrats de San Francisco solo respaldan a candidatos que se alinean con los valores del club. Podemos recomendar candidatos que no respaldamos completamente. Sin embargo, hay casos que no respaldamos ni recomendamos.

United States Senator / 美國參議員 / Senadora de los Estados Unidos:

Barbara Lee 芭芭拉李

California State Senate, District 7 / 加州參議員,第7選區 / Senado del Estado de California, Distrito 7:

Jovanka Beckles 貝寇斯

California State Assembly, District 19 / 加州眾議員,第19選區 / Asamblea del Estado de California, Distrito 19

Recommend/推薦/Recomendar* David Lee 李志威

* Recommend :  We recommend, but don’t fully endorse. / 推薦: 不等於背書 / Recomendamos, pero no apoyamos completamente.

San Francisco Superior Court Judge, Seat 1 / 高等法院法官,第1席候選人 / Juez del Tribunal Superior de San Francisco, asiento 1:

Judge Michael Begert / 麥可·伊薩庫·貝格特 法官 / Juez Michael Begert

San Francisco Superior Court Judge, Seat 13 / 高等法院法官,第13席候選人 / Juez del Tribunal Superior de San Francisco, asiento 13:

Judge Patrick Thompson / 派崔克·S·湯普森 法官 / Juez Patrick Thompson

SFDCCC:

Labor & Working Families Slate / 三藩市縣民主黨中央委員會 / Lista de trabajadores y familias trabajadoras:

Assembly District 17 (14 Seats) / 第17選區 (14 席) / Distrito 17 de la Asamblea (14 puestos o asientos):

John Avalos 艾華樂 | Patrick Bell 派崔克·貝爾 | Gloria Berry 歌莉·婭貝理 | Vick Chung 鍾曉雲 | Peter Gallotta 彼得 ‧ 加洛塔 | Kristin Hardy 克里斯汀·哈迪 | Jane Kim 金貞妍 | Jeremy Lee 李銘富 | Anita Martinez 安妮塔 ‧ 馬丁內茲 | Michael Nguyen 阮忠誠 | Joshua Rudy Ochoa 約書亞·魯迪·奧喬亞 | Sal Rosselli 薩爾·羅塞利 | Sydney Simpson 悉尼 | Adolfo Velasquez 阿道夫 ‧ 維拉奎茲

Assembly District 19 (10 Seats) / 第19選區 (10 席) / Distrito 19 de la Asamblea (10 puestos o asientos):

Connie Chan 陳詩敏 | Queena Chen 陳慧君 | Natalie Gee 朱凱勤 | Greg Hardeman 葛雷格·哈德曼 | Frances Hsieh 謝令宜 | Hene Kelly 希尼 ‧ 凱 | Leah LaCroix 莉亞 ‧ 拉華克 | Sandra Lee Fewer 李麗嫦 | Gordon Mar 馬兆明 | Mano Raju 力儲文

↥ Back to top

California State Proposition 1 / 加州選票提案 1 / Propuesta 1 del Estado de California:
Amendments to Mental Health Services Act/Bond Measure
精神健康服務法/債券措施修正案
Enmiendas a la Ley de Servicios de Salud Mental y Medida de Bonos

NO! ❌

Cuts voluntary, community-based mental health services. Impacts services for underserved communities, including culturally responsive services for racial and ethnic minority communities. Expands involuntary mental health treatment.

反對! 這提案削減自願的以社區為基礎的心理健康服務。已缺乏服務的社區將受影響,包括為少數族裔提供相應語言文化服務的社區。此提案過擴大非自願心理健康治療。

¡NO! Elimina servicios de salud mental que son voluntarios y comunitarios. Impacto servicios para la comunidad de bajos recursos, incluio también quita servicios que son culturalmente aceptables en minorías raciales y étnicas. Expande tratamiento de salud mental involuntario.

Local Measures / 地方選票提案/ Medidas Locales:

Measure A: Affordable Housing Bond

YES! YES! YES! ✅

(Requires 2/3rds majority to pass)
Bond measure to finance affordable housing, particularly workforce and senior housing, and housing for low-income to moderate income households.

提案 A: 可負擔房屋債券
支持! 支持! 支持! (需要2/3多數通過) 為經濟適用住房(特別是勞動階級和長者住房以及低收入至中等收入家庭的住房)提供資金的債券措施。

Medida A: Bono de Vivienda Asequible
¡SÍ! ¡SÍ! ¡SÍ! (Requiere mayoría de 2/3 para ser aprobado)
Medida de bonos para financiar viviendas asequibles, particularmente viviendas para trabajadores y personas mayores, y viviendas para hogares de ingresos bajos a moderados.

Measure B: Police Officer Staffing Levels, Future Funding Options

NO!! ❌

Restores mandatory minimum police staffing with determination of funding sources: e.g., new taxation or reallocation of other resources. Measure based on unproven premise that more police equals public safety and runs counter to our goal of criminal justice reform.

提案 B: 警官人員配置水平,未來的資金選擇
反對!! 恢復強制性最低警察人員配備,並確定資金來源:例如新的稅收或其他資源的重新分配。這提案是基於未經證實的假設 — 更多警察等於公共安全,而與我們刑事司法改革的目標背道而馳。

Medida B: Niveles de dotación de personal de agentes de policía, opciones de financiación futuras
¡¡NO!! Restaura el personal policial mínimo obligatorio con la determinación de fuentes de financiación, incluidos nuevos impuestos o reasignación de otros recursos. La medida se basa en la suposición no fundamentada ni comprobada de que más policías equivale a mejor seguridad pública y va en contra de nuestro objetivo de reformar el sistema de justicia penal.

Measure C: Real Estate Transfer Tax Exemption for Conversion of Office Space to Residential Use

HELL NO!!!! ❌

Exempts from real estate transfer tax first time sale of property which has been converted from commercial to residential use. Has no requirement that conversion include any affordable housing. An attempt by Mayor Breed to reverse the voter implemented transfer tax on extremely high value property sales. There is no evidence that a transfer tax impacts the decision to convert from commercial to residential use. Boondoggle for wealthy landowners.

提案 C: 將辦公空間改為住宅用途的房地產轉讓稅豁免
強烈反對!!!! 該提案對首次出售從商業用途轉變為住宅用途的房產免徵房地產轉讓稅。適用減免轉讓稅的房屋裏不包括任何可負擔房屋。布里德市長試圖扭轉選民通過以往投票對大型商業房地產銷售徵收轉讓稅的决定,而三藩市已經面臨嚴重的預算赤字,這將加劇市府的財政危機,並導致基本服務的進一步削減。沒有證據表明轉讓稅會影響房屋從商業用途轉換為住宅用途的決定。

Medida C: Exención del Impuesto sobre Transferencias de Bienes Raíces para la Conversión de Espacio de Oficinas a Uso Residencial
¡NO! ¡De ninguna manera! Excluye el pago de impuesto de transferencia de bienes raíces en la primera venta de una propiedad que ha sido convertida de uso comercial a residencial. No tiene ningún requisito de que la conversión incluya viviendas asequibles. Un intento ambiguo de la alcaldesa Breed de revertir el impuesto de transferencia implementado por los votantes sobre las ventas de propiedades de valor extremadamente alto. No hay datos que demuestren que un impuesto de transferencia afecte la decisión de convertir de uso comercial a residencial. Esto es un despilfarro en favor de adinerado propietarios.

Measure D: Changes to Local Ethics Laws

YES! ✅

Tightens local ethics laws to require greater reporting of gifts received by politicians or on their behalf. Clarifies when a gift is a bribe. Makes rules more uniform. Requires ethics training. Requires disclosure of relationships to avoid ethical conflicts.

提案 D: 當地道德法的變更
支持! 收緊當地道德法,要求更多地報告政客或他們的代表收到的禮物。澄清禮物何時屬於賄賂。使規則更加統一。需要道德培訓。要求揭露關係以避免道德衝突。

Medida D: Cambios a las leyes de ética locales
¡SÍ! Refuerza las leyes de ética locales para exigir una mayor información sobre los obsequios recibidos por políticos o en su nombre. Aclara cuándo un regalo es un soborno. Hace que las reglas sean más uniformes. Requiere formación de ética. Requiere divulgación de relaciones personales para evitar conflictos éticos.

Measure E: Overhaul of Police Department Policies and Procedures

HELL NO!!!! ❌

Mayor Breed’s attempt to circumvent the independent Police Commission, to enable dangerous police vehicular chases, to remove police oversight, to allow unregulated police surveillance, to reduce police reporting of their use of force. Proposal is a danger to our community, allowing much police activity to be unregulated and without oversight.

提案 E: 警察局政策和程序的改革
強烈反對!!!! 布里德市長試圖繞過獨立警察委員會,允許實施危險的警車追捕,取消警察監督,允許不受監管的警察監視,減少警察對其使用武力的報告。提案對我們的社區構成危險,使許多警察活動不受管制和監督。

Medida E: Revisión de las políticas y procedimientos del Departamento de Policía
¡NO! ¡Absolutamente NO! El intento de la alcaldesa Breed de eludir la Comisión de Policía independiente, permitir persecuciones policiales peligrosas con vehículos, eliminar la supervisión policial, permitir vigilancia policial no regulada y reducir las denuncias policiales sobre uso de la fuerza. La propuesta es un peligro para nuestra comunidad, ya que permite que gran parte de la actividad policial no esté regulada ni supervisada.

Measure F: Substance Abuse Screening of Public Assistance Recipients

HELL NO!!!! ❌

Requires certain public benefit recipients submit to screening for substance use or lose benefits. Recipient could be forced into involuntary treatment. Loss of benefits can mean loss of employment; can result in homelessness or inability to get housing. Poor people will be even more destitute. Yet the rich can continue to abuse drugs behind closed doors and without consequences.

提案 F: 公共援助接受者的藥物濫用篩檢
強烈反對!!!! 要求三藩市公共福利受益人接受藥物濫用測試篩檢,否則這些受益人將失去福利。然而市府沒有足夠的治療床位供目前需要治療的人使用,因此這其實不是解決我們毒品危機的政策。失去福利可能意味著失業;可能導致無家可歸或無法獲得住房。如果說有什麼影響的話,這措施會將三藩市變得更不安全。

Medida F: Evaluación de abuso de sustancias en personas beneficiarias de asistencia pública
¡NO, NO y NO! Requiere que ciertas personas que reciben beneficios públicos sean examinadas para detectar el uso de sustancias o resultar en la pérdida de beneficios. La receptora podría ser forzada a un
tratamiento involuntario. La pérdida de beneficios puede significar la pérdida de la capacidad de conseguir un empleo y puede resultar en la falta de vivienda o la imposibilidad de conseguir una vivienda. Aún los ricos podrán seguir consumiendo drogas a puerta cerrada y sin consecuencias.

Measure G: Non-Binding Advisory Measure Urging SFUSD to offer Algebra 1 to 8th Graders

NO!!! ❌

Without input of educators and those most knowledgeable about math curriculum, Supervisor Engardio wants to interfere with the Board of Education’s oversight of SFUSD’s educational processes. Overlooks that SFUSD currently includes algebraic concepts throughout its math curriculum, in grade 7 and earlier. Also this proposal ignores the financial issues currently being confronted by SFUSD and other public school systems.

提案 G: 非約束性諮商措施敦促校區向八年級學生提供一級代數課程
反對!!! 市參事殷嘉立在没有教育工作者和最了解數學課程的人参與的情況下,希望幹擾教育委員會對校區教育過程的監督。忽視了校區目前在 7 年級及更早的數學課程中包含了代數概念。該提案也忽略了校區和其他公立學校系統目前面臨的財務問題。

Medida G: Medida asesora no vinculante que insta al SFUSD a ofrecer álgebra a estudiantes de 1.° a 8.° grado
¡Definitivamente NO! Sin el aporte de los educadores y de aquellos con mayor conocimiento sobre el plan de estudios de matemáticas, el Supervisor Engardio quiere interferir en la supervisión de la Mesa Directiva de Educación en los procesos educativos del SFUSD. SFUSD actualmente incluye conceptos algebraicos en todo su plan de estudios de matemáticas, en el grado 7 y antes. También esta propuesta ignora los problemas financieros que actualmente enfrenta el distrito escolar SFUSD y otros sistemas de educación pública.

↥ Back to top

SF Berniecrats 2023 Officer Election Results

After all the votes have been counted, we have our elected officers for 2023! Congratulations to our newly elected officers:

2023 SF Berniecrats Officers
2023/24 Officers

Co-Chairs: Janelle Jolley & Joshua Rudy Ochoa
Treasurer: Mary Leatherman
Membership Coordinator: Adam Kim
Communications Coordinator: Brett Wilkins
Elections & Endorsement Coordinator: Laura Goldin
Events & Fundraising Coordinator: Toby Sachs-Quintana
Recorder: Julie Pitta
Tech Manager: Steven Mazliach
Community Outreach Coordinator: Winnie Porter

You can read the bios of our officers on the Officers Page.

We thank you for your support to continue leading our club and helping to uplift the progressive movement in San Francisco!

Dues for 2023 Membership

If you haven’t already, please make sure to pay your membership dues for 2023 to remain a voting member of the San Francisco Berniecrats! We’ll be focusing on coalition-building, expanding our club’s membership, and getting out into the community to do the necessary work.

November 2022 Endorsements

San Francisco General Election – November 8, 2022

Thank you so much for your participation and involvement in our November 2022 endorsements process! We heard from a ton of incredible candidates during our August meeting and heard about their plans and priorities, and how they plan on fighting for progressive values across the City. After tallying the votes from our membership, here are our November 2022 Endorsements. Scroll down for more info and explanations!!

More details and explanations about our positions:

Local Ballot Measures / 三藩市市縣提案 / Medidas electorales locales:

Measure A – YES ✅

This measure assures that the very small group of SF retired employees who retired before November 1996 — most of whom are in their nineties now — get the Cost of Living Adjustment they’re contractually owed.

贊成。退休公務員應獲得合同規定的生活成本調整。

Sí. los jubilados deben recibir el ajuste al costo de vida que se les debe por contrato.

Measure B – No Position

This measure repeals November 2020’s Measure B which created a Department of Sanitation and divided the corrupt Department of Public Works responsibilities between the new department and the DPW. This new Measure B will also limit qualifications and duties of the oversight committee created by the 2020 Measure B. The major problem seems to be that the new Department has yet to be created.

無立場 。公共工程部門及衛生和街道部門

Sin posición.

Measure C – No Position

This Oversight of the Department of Homelessness is needed, but having an oversight committee which is dominated by mayoral appointments to oversee the Department which is already run by the Mayor’s office is unlikely to address the need.

無立場 。我們需要加強對市府無家可歸部門的監督,但讓市長監督自己的部門不可行。

Sin posición. Si se necesita la supervisión del Departamento de Personas sin Hogar, pero hacer que el alcalde supervise su propio comité no funciona.

Measure D – HELL NO! ❌

This is a developer/real-estate funded proposal which does nothing to address San Francisco’s need for housing for low income and unhoused residents. It is not union/family/low-income friendly. If passed anything built will likely further the SF income divide.

反對! 這將高收入人群的更昂貴的房居重新定義為“可負擔”。

CLARO QUE NO! Desarrollador/financiado por bienes raíces, no apto para sindicatos/familias/personas de bajos ingresos.

Measure E – HELL YES!! ✅

This is a better solution to meet the housing needs. It will further construction of housing for families and for lower income San Franciscans. It will also assure that the jobs created by building such low-income family housing are union jobs.

贊成! 這將導致更多真正可負擔房居。

¡POR SUPUESTO QUE SÍ! Apoya trabajos sindicales y viviendas para familias de bajos ingresos.

Measure F – YES ✅

Not a new tax. Extends the property tax assessment until 2048, which is currently set to expire. The sole purpose of the assessment is the preservation of our public libraries.

贊成。讓我們保護公共圖書館。

Sí. No es un nuevo impuesto: preservará nuestras bibliotecas públicas.

Measure G – HELL YES!! ✅

All students in the SFUSD deserve success. This will help to ensure that San Francisco public funds support public school student achievement and receive needed social/emotional wellness services.

贊成。我們在舊金山聯合學區的學生應該取得成功。

¡POR SUPUESTO QUE SI! Todos los estudiantes del SFUSD merecen tener éxito.

Measure H – HELL YES!! ✅

Other cities have done similar moves of local elections to even-numbered years, which has resulted in far greater voter participation. It may also be a financial savings as the off-year, low turn-out election of the Mayor and other local offices would be consolidated with other high turn-out statewide and national elections.

贊成。我們希望在偶數年舉行城市選舉,以便有更多的選民參與。

¡POR SUPUESTO QUE SI! Elecciones de la ciudad en años pares = más participación de votantes.

Measure I – NO ❌

This ill-advised & Trump donor-funded proposal will permanently reopen JFK Dr & the Great Highway to dangerous pre-pandemic traffic. There is no guarantee that this measure would address accessibility concerns, and instead, it would increase emissions.

反對。金門公園和高速公路肯尼迪大道上的車輛。

No. No queremos abrir permanentemente JFK Dr & Great Highway al tráfico peligroso previo a la pandemia.

Measure J – No Position

This measure incorporates the Board of Supervisors-instated closure of JFK Dr into the City Charter.

無立場。金門公園肯尼迪大道的娛樂用途。

Sin posición.

Measure L – YES ✅

This measure extends existing taxation of certain businesses for transportation purposes (e.g. safe roads, pedestrian crossings) for an additional 30 years, which was originally implemented in 1989 and extended in 2003.

贊成。運輸當局的銷售稅。

Sí. Impuesto sobre Ventas para la Autoridad de Transporte

Measure M – HELL YES!! ✅

This proposes the taxation of units intentionally kept vacant by their owners for more than half the year. Funds from the tax will be used for low-income and elderly housing subsidies, and to acquire, rehabilitate, and then operate buildings as affordable housing. Let’s tax those vacant units and fund much-needed affordable housing!

非常贊成!空置單位應該是稅收。

¡POR SUPUESTO QUE SI! Que se cobre impuestos a las unidades vacantes: ¡deberían estar ocupadas!

Measure N – No Position

This will transfer authority of Golden Gate Park underground parking from the Concourse Authority to the Recreation and Park Department. However, while it is a good idea to remove private control of the parking garage, this proposal fails to assure that Rec & Park control will make the garage either affordable or accessible.

無立場。金門公園地下停車場。

Sin Posición. Poner el Estacionamiento Subterráneo del Parque Golden Gate bajo Rec & Park puede no hacerlo asequible o accesible.

Measure O – HELL YES!! ✅

This is a minuscule parcel tax which would help fund City College. Let’s save City College by approving this equitable parcel tax!

非常贊成!讓我們通過額外的包裹稅來拯救城市學院

¡POR SUPUESTO QUE SI! ¡Salvemos a City College a través de un minúsculo impuesto a la propiedad!

Local Candidates / 三藩市市縣 / Candidatos Locales:

Board of Supervisors / 三藩市市議會 / Junta de Supervisores:

District 2: No Endorsement / 無背書 / Sin apoyo.
District 4: Gordon Mar 馬兆明
District 6: Honey Mahogany 霍尼‧莫豪格尼
District 8: Recommend* Rafael Mandelman 建議* 孟達文
District 10: Shamann Walton 華頌

Board of Education / 教育委員會成員 / Junta Escolar:

Alida Fisher 阿莉達‧斐義莎
Gabriela Lopez 盧佩思
Karen Fleshman 凱倫‧費雪曼

City College of San Francisco (CCSF) / 社區大學董事會成員 / Colegio Comunitario:

Anita Martinez 安妮塔‧馬丁內茲
Vick Chung 鍾曉雲
Susan Solomon 蘇珊‧莎洛文

City College of San Francisco (CCSF) – 2yr term / 社區大學董事會成員(2年) / Colegio Comunitario – 2 años:

Adolfo Velasquez

Assessor-Recorder // Assesor-Registrador:

No Endorsement. / 無背書 / Sin apoyo.

District Attorney / 地方檢察官 / Fiscal del Distrito:

John Hamasaki 濱崎

Public DEFENDER / 公共辯護律師 / Defendor Publico:

Mano Raju 力儲文

BART Board, district 8 / 灣區捷運董事第8選區 / BART, Distrito 8:

Janice Li 李正元

Read the responses to our candidate questionnaires that were used in our deliberations.

* Recommend :  We recommend, but don’t fully endorse. / 建議: 不等於背書 / Recomendamos, pero no apoyamos completamente.

Candidate Questionnaires – November 2022 Election

The San Francisco Berniecrats’ Endorsement Committee has received the following questionnaires from candidates under consideration for endorsement for the November 2022 Election:

BART Director, District 8:

District Attorney

Public Defender

Board of Education (3 seats):

Community College Board (4 seats)

Board of Supervisors, District 2

Board of Supervisors, District 4

Board of Supervisors, District 6

Board of Supervisors, District 8

Board of Supervisors, District 10

DAVID CAMPOS Answers Our Endorsement Questionnaire for AD-17 Special Election

Hello! The San Francisco Berniecrats are reaching out to your campaign with the opportunity to submit answers to our Endorsement Questionnaire! Please answer the following questions to the best & trust of your ability, and our Endorsement Committee will review the answers to help our decision on which candidate to recommend or endorse for the upcoming election, based on our mission and values.

1. If elected, what will you do to address the housing crisis in San Francisco and California? Did you support 2021’s SBs 9 and 10? Would you fight for higher affordability requirements in upzoning legislation and, if so, what would those be?

For decades, California has suffered from an extreme housing crisis. We need more affordable housing in California, not just more luxury housing. And we need housing that will not contribute to environmental degradation, traffic gridlock and most importantly, displacement. While I think there are many beneficial elements to SB 9 and SB 10, these bills need to be improved with bolder proposals to create affordable housing, requirements that housing is near transit or supported by transit improvements, and most of all, that these bills do not become legal cover for mass displacement of low-income families. We have seen the terrible history of “redevelopment” in San Francisco which became an excuse for removing and erasing communities of color. Giving private developers a virtual blank check to build in low income communities without the consent of those communities is dangerous – and we should amend both of those bills to make them work as intended.

2. If elected, what would you do to fund and support social housing (AB 387), and specifically municipal social housing? Did you support November 2020 Propositions I and K? Do you support the large-scale decommodification of housing?

I have and will continue to support the funding of social housing, and I was proud to support Supervisor Dean Preston’s efforts to make San Francisco the model for what it means to unlock the keys to social housing and create a city that looks at what it can do to solve a historic housing crisis and not just at what it can’t do. I publicly supported Propositions I and K in the November 2020 election. In fact, I oversaw the San Francisco Democratic Party’s official endorsement of the two measures as its Chair in 2020 and made sure that the Board supported these two propositions. I also worked on mailers and mobilizations for Propositions I and K as

Chair of the Party.

I support the large-scale decommodification of housing. We need to start treating affordable housing as the ultimate solution for homelessness and other social inequities, instead of a profitable market that only serves the wealthy. Instead, we must look towards alternative housing models—that protect incumbent tenants from exorbitant rent increases and gentrification — to create secure and affordable housing for generations to come.

3. If elected, will you support CalCare (AB 1400)? What will you do to ensure that CalCare passes through the state legislature in 2022? Do you support California having a single-payer healthcare system, including undocumented Californians?

Healthcare has consistently been one of my top priorities throughout my career. I believe our state has a long way to go in expanding access to healthcare, particularly in addressing the racial inequities that impact marginalized groups.

If elected, I would support CalCare, and I will do everything in my power as a member of the State Assembly to ensure that it passes through the State Legislature in 2022. I will unequivocally voice my public opinion on this stance, join the coauthors of the bill to vote for its passing, and should it not pass, I would seek reconsideration. I wholeheartedly support the creation of a single payer system.

It is unconscionable that we don’t have single-payer in our state, especially considering our Democratic supermajority. I believe that the broad range of experiences I have had, as an undocumented immigrant without health security; as a local elected official fighting against sub-standard employers and profit-seeking health care corporations to preserve and expand access to quality health care services and good health care jobs for uninsured, underinsured, and historically underserved immigrants and other low and middle-income constituents; and as a county administrator charged with advancing equity and social justice during the worst pandemic in a century, uniquely qualify me to be an effective advocate for single payer.

4. If elected, what will you do to ensure California addresses the climate crisis? Will you support the California Green New Deal (AB 1839) in 2022, and fight for investments in public transit? Do you support a ban on fracking? How would you start a statewide conversation on decarbonization with CADEM leadership, building trades, and other elected officials?

California needs a Green New Deal. If elected, I will proudly sign on in support of AB1839. Cleaning up our environment with a Green New Deal will do more than fight climate change. It will fight poverty with green jobs typically paying much more than a living wage. It will fight crime with crime rates plummeting for people with stable, family-sustaining jobs. And it will fight diseases like cancer, diabetes, asthma and even COVID-19, which we know are made worse by wildfire smoke and air pollution.

As a Supervisor, I often fought to make sure that environmental issues, and the health of our communities were considered in tandem and given equal standing with economic considerations, especially when it came to land use approvals and business licensing decisions. I opposed development projects such as the Hunters Point Shipyard development in Bayview Hunters Point by Lennar and supported shutting down PG&E’s polluting peaker plants for that very reason. One of my proudest achievements as a Supervisor was authoring the landmark legislation that established Clean Power SF, the community choice aggregation program which competes with PG&E and offers customers like myself 100% clean energy in San Francisco. It is for this very reason that I was also proud to pass Free Muni for Low Income Youth, to enhance access to our public transportation system and reduce our reliance on driving.

As the elected chair of the California Democratic Party, I ran as the progressive candidate, championing progressive policies like the Green New Deal. Just as I have done on the San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee, I am committed to turning the party into one that fights unapologetically for progressive policies, elects unapologetically progressive candidates, and builds an unapologetically progressive state. To that end, I oppose CADEM accepting money from fossil fuel interests, and am actively working with our leadership to end the practice.

As an Assemblymember, I will collaborate with legislative colleagues, environmental advocates, and community stakeholders to set more aggressive target dates and amounts for the reduction of greenhouse emissions in California, with an emphasis on ensuring that such reductions do not occur on paper alone. We must reduce the disproportionate burden of pollution in California’s low-income communities and communities of color. While serving on the Board of Supervisors, as San Francisco’s representative on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, I worked to ensure proper implementation of existing state legislation designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the Bay Area.

Additionally, I support a ban on fracking. I do believe that in the process of developing such a ban, we should work with labor partners to make sure that they have a role in the development and implementation of the ban to ensure the protection of workers who have retired from or are currently working in that industry.

5. If elected, how will you support public education and our educators? Do you support increasing funding for K-12, ensuring free public college for all (CCC, CSU, UC), and fighting against the privatization of our education system? How will you attract more public school educators to address the statewide shortage?

Improving our education system is fundamental to addressing and uprooting the inequities of our society. An education system that gives all of our children an equitable start would lead to better

economic and social outcomes for individuals, for our region, and ultimately our nation— something I saw first hand as serving as the General Counsel for the San Francisco Public School System, where I oversaw implementation of a federal Consent Decree to ensure equal opportunity for students of color in San Francisco Unified. I would continue my support of public education and educators on a state-wide platform as an Assemblymember. I wholeheartedly support increasing funding for K-12 education.

As a San Francisco District Supervisor, I supported and fought for legislation making city college free for all— I intend to ensure free public college for all Californians as well. I also will fight against the privatization of our education system— I believe that education should act as an equalizer and there should be no financial barriers or exclusion in our public education system. I hope that fighting for an increase in funding for K-12 education— including a well-deserved and well-overdue pay raise for educators— will attract more educators and address the statewide shortage.

But a critical component of school funding is property tax reform. We need a split roll now. I was a huge supporter of Prop 15 last year, and was deeply saddened by its narrow failure that denied our schools and communities funds that they are in dire need of. Before Proposition 13 passed, around ⅓ of property taxes were paid by individuals and ⅔ by businesses. Today those numbers are reversed and it is hurting our children by shrinking the pool of money available for vital public services. Corporations in California need to pay their fair share, and when I am in the Assembly I will make sure they do.

6. If elected, how will you fight socioeconomic inequity in California? Do you support implementing a wealth tax (AB 1253), in addition to getting rid of corporate dark money in elections (AB 20)?

Yes, I support both AB 1253 and the Corporate-Free Elections Act (AB 20).

We must ensure that those who have the greatest means pay their fair share in our society. Consistent with that principle, at the local level, I have supported taxing the wealthy, including wealthy corporations to provide for basic services for the neediest among us. As San Francisco Supervisor, I voted against the Twitter Tax Break, and when that vote failed, I created the Legacy Business Program to help small businesses that were struggling to stay open during the “Great Recession” in the aftermath of the 2007 financial crisis. As Chair of the San Francisco Democratic Party, I was proud to lead in the successful passage of Proposition C, which taxed top earning corporations in San Francisco to pay for homeless services. I would support similar efforts at the state level.

I also believe that fair elections are elections that are free of money from corporations, big businesses, and corrupt special interests. This is why I have voiced my support for legislation like the Corporate-Free Elections Act (AB 20) which prohibits a candidate for elected office in

California from receiving a contribution from a business entity, and a business entity from making a contribution to a candidate for elective office. I am committed to preventing corporate, special interest money from flooding into electoral races, and I am committed to calling out and holding corporations and candidates accountable who condone and support what, in my view, is the buying of elections here in San Francisco, and across the state.

I am currently the only candidate who has publicly committed to running a corporate-free campaign. My campaign will not accept any money from corporate interests.

7. If elected, how will you help get progressives elected into office, up and down the ballot? How did you / would you handle seats being vacated by you running for another office or terming out (in the past, present and/or in the future)?

I know that the work that needs to be done can’t be done alone, and that we need to bring more progressive leaders to the table. Throughout my career I have always been a champion for progressive organizers and community leaders ready to make the jump to elected office. As a Supervisor, County Party Chair, or State Party Vice Chair, I have never been afraid to lend my time, money, and early pubIic support to progressive champions like Dean Preston, Chesa Boudin, and Jackie Fielder, all of whom are supporting me in this race because they know I won’t hesitate to advance our shared progressive agenda at the state level.

There are many interests working to keep progressives out of power. That is why it is so important that when we term out or ascend to higher office, we do everything in our power to make sure we are succeeded by someone who shares our values. In 2016, I fully supported and helped Supervisor Ronen get elected. In the race to succeed myself as Chair of the SF Democratic Party, I was proud to support and help Honey Mahogany, the first Black transgender member of the San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee, get elected as a Chair of the SF Democratic Party. She has the progressive values we need to make sure the SFDCCC endorses candidates that reflect our progressive ideals.

8. As the SF DCCC, UESF, and several major SF democratic clubs have passed resolutions opposing the Republican-funded recall elections, how do you plan on supporting our D.A. and Board of Education against the potential recalls, to safeguard the rights of voters to choose who represents the people of San Francisco?

Republicans are abusing recalls at both the state and local level to undermine our democracy. Barring egregious misconduct, elected officials should be allowed to serve the term that the voters elected them to serve. As Chair of the San Francisco Democratic Party, I supported a resolution in May to publicly condemn all of the recall efforts, and will continue to be a loud voice of opposition to the recall of Chesa Boudin. I am also against the recall of BoE President Gabriela López and Vice President Faauuga Moliga. However, when I receive my ballot I will be voting to recall Member Alison Collins. I could not stand in solidarity with my Asian American

husband and vote otherwise.

9. Is there anything else you’d like to add that our Endorsement Committee should know that could assist us in endorsing a candidate that represents our values?

I’m proud to say that during my tenure representing District 9 on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, I established myself as the most progressive voice on the Board, and as a fearless fighter for the underdog, including working on the following:

● Protected San Francisco’s Healthcare Care Security Ordinance against efforts by the business community to pocket tens of millions of dollars per year that should have gone to provide healthcare for their workers.

● Working closely with allies, I helped lead the fight against CMPC’s effort to close St. Luke’s hospital and build the CPMC Van Ness Campus union-free, eventually working to put together an agreement that ensured the building of a world class hospital at the Bernal/Mission Campus, and helping nurses successfully maintain and expand their union.

● Enacted landmark pay equity legislation to ensure pay equity for women and people of color who work for City government.

Every one of my progressive accomplishments is the result of broad coalition building with community activists and stakeholders to fight for results that move our city and state in a more progressive, equitable, and inclusive direction.

And as a proud and vocal supporter of Bernie Sanders in both the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, I would be proud to earn the support of the San Francisco Berniecrats.